Wednesday December 7, 2022
Case of the Week
Including Children in Charitable Plans
Case:Keith and Karen Crosby, ages 75 and 72, own a parcel of undeveloped real estate that they have held since 1979. They purchased the property for $10,000 and the current fair market value is approximately $800,000. Their initial goal for this property was to transfer it to their two children upon their passing, however they could currently use more income. Since their estate is approximately $3 million and each has an estate exemption over $12.06 million, they are not facing estate taxes if they were to pass away in 2022.
They have not considered selling the property because of the capital gains tax consequences, so they find themselves between a rock and a hard place on how to increase their income. They are both in relatively good health, however Keith did suffer a heart attack seven years ago and Karen recently suffered a minor stroke. They have both recovered nicely and are continuing to maintain an active lifestyle and travel frequently.
Keith and Karen are active philanthropists and were recently presented an award which honored their years of service and financial support of a local charity. They are interested in leaving a bequest to this favorite charity but would also like to couple this gift with benefits for their children. Because they plan to travel more extensively in the future, additional income would be a worthwhile objective in their planning. In discussions with Susan Collins, the Director of Major Gifts at their favorite charity, she explained the concept of funding a lifetime charitable remainder unitrust with the undeveloped real estate. Susan then suggested that they could replace the asset by purchasing insurance through a life insurance trust. By using the "Crummey" power, the insurance could pass to their children free of gift and estate tax.
Question:Susan did not realize that because of Keith and Karen's health history, they may not qualify for affordable life insurance. Therefore, since the replacement insurance idea is not available to Keith and Karen, is there some other method to transfer value to the children and also provide for charity?
Solution:In a subsequent meeting with the Crosbys, Susan explained that there may be another way to fulfill their objectives. They could, for example, consider funding a unitrust that will last for their lifetimes. After they pass away, the unitrust would continue to distribute income to their children for a period of 15 years. In order to avoid any gift tax consequences, a testamentary power of revocation will be included in the unitrust document. However, because there are no gift tax consequences at the time of funding, Keith and Karen will be required to include a portion of the trust corpus in their estates.
For example, assume Keith and Karen create a FLIP life-plus-term unitrust with jointly held property. When Keith passes away, one-half of the value of the trust as of his date of death is includible in his estate (assuming he passes away first). A charitable estate tax deduction calculated on a one-life-plus-term trust will then be available on Keith's estate tax return. The net amount (one-half of the trust corpus minus the deduction) is subject to potential estate taxation. Subsequently, when Karen passes away, a similar computation is performed on her one-half interest in the trust corpus with the charitable estate deduction calculated on the remaining term of years trust.
Susan also explained the potential impact of estate tax. If the unitrust paid only to Keith and Karen, it would qualify for the marital deduction in the first estate and the charitable deduction in the survivor's estate. But since the trust would also pay to children, there is no marital deduction. However, since Keith and Karen each have their full estate exemption available, estate taxes will not be a problem.
Keith and Karen are both pleased with this planning option and decide to use the undeveloped land to fund a unitrust for their lives with an extended term payable to their children for an additional 15 years. They decide to choose a 5% payout. When the property is sold within the trust, they can expect to receive a distribution of $40,000 the first year with increasing distributions in future years, should the trust investments yield more than 5%. They will bypass the capital gains taxes and receive an income tax deduction of over $175,000. When they pass away, the children will receive 15 years of income from the trust. The total income is estimated to more than replace the property used to fund the trust initially.
Through the life-plus-term concept, Keith and Karen are able to fulfill all of their objectives – increased income for traveling, bypass of capital gains taxes, provision for the children and a substantial gift for their favorite charity.